Wednesday, April 13, 2011

the power of love

Over the past few months or so, I've developed a growing appreciation for Christianity. Among the similarities I've already found between Buddhism and Christianity, another possibility is their seeming agreement on the salvific power of love.

In Richard Gombrich's new book, What the Buddha Thought, for example, he mentions that, while the idea of loving-kindness (metta) being salvific is often neglected in Theravada (i.e., the general consensus traditional being that the four brahma-viharas themselves only lead to rebirth in the Brahma realms, not nibbana), there are texts in the Pali Canon extolling kindness and how it can lead to enlightenment. One is the Metta Sutta (found at Khp 9 and Snp 1.8), which begins with extolling kindness towards the world, and climaxes with this passage:

Towards the whole world one should develop loving thoughts boundless: upwards, downwards, sideways, without restriction, enmity or rivalry. Standing, walking, sitting or lying, one should be as alert as possible and keep one's mind on this. They call this divine living in the world. Not taking up ideas, virtuous with perfect insight, by controlling greed for sensual pleasure one does not return to lie in the womb. (Gombrich's translation)


He notes that, "This conclusion to the poem surely corroborates that the whole poem is about how one may become enlightened. Moreover, it is natural to interpret 'not returning to lie in the womb' as meaning that one will have escaped altogether from the cycle of rebirth, which is to say that one will have attained nirvana" (87). Of course, he's careful to point out that the poem doesn't state kindness alone will produce salvific results, and that it mentions other qualities of great importance (e.g., insight and self-control), but then he brings up Dhp 368:

The monk who dwells in kindness, with faith in the Buddha's teachings, may attain the peaceful state, the blissful cessation of conditioning. (Gombrich's tranlsation)


Gombrich concludes this passage is "saying that kindness is salvific, and it is surely no coincidence that the term for nirvana, 'the peaceful state', is the same as the one used at the opening of the Metta Sutta" (87).

So while I'm not sure if love alone can lead to nibbana, I'm more inclined to agree with Gombrich that it can be salvific in the proper context. It's one of the ten perfections, after all, which are not only the skillful qualities one develops as one follows the path to nibbana, but the basis of the path to full Buddhahood as well. And this, I think, accords well with passages in the Bible such as, "Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love" (1 John 4:8).

2 comments:

  1. Jason,

    You may be interested in this:
    http://simonpilgrim.blogspot.com/2011/04/we-are-loved-unconditionally.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jason,
    We used to talk on esangha and I admire your writings on Buddhism on which I have nothing to add, but in this post you're in my territory. John's Gospel and St Paul's letters sound close to Buddhism because they have something, not clear what, in common. Probably Platonism, Pythagoreanism, Gnosticism, and ancient Indo-European ideas which Gombrich finds Buddha referencing in Rgveda. Also Zoroastrianiam. Linguistically and proto-philosophically Greeks and Indo-Buddhists have common origins. Just what those origins are is not yet clear, maybe ancient, maybe as recent as Alexander. But commonality is clear. Thus John's very Greek Gospel is not a good comparison.

    Were any of Jesus original followers Greek scholars? Was Jesus himself? John is regarded as separate from the other 4 Gospels for that obvious reason. I just had this debate with an Orthodox priest, and he was not happy with me.

    ReplyDelete